• At Kemp Little, we are known for our ability to serve the very particular needs of a large but diverse technology client base. Our hands-on industry know-how makes us a good fit with many of the world's biggest technology and digital media businesses, yet means we are equally relevant to companies with a technology bias, in sectors such as professional services, financial services, retail, travel and healthcare.
  • Kemp Little specialises in the technology and digital media sectors and provides a range of legal services that are crucial to fast-moving, innovative businesses.Our blend of sector awareness, technical excellence and responsiveness, means we are regularly ranked as a leading firm by directories such as Legal 500, Chambers and PLC Which Lawyer. Our practice areas cover a wide range of legal issues and advice.
  • Our Commercial Technology team has established itself as one of the strongest in the UK. We are ranked in Legal 500, Chambers & Partners and PLC Which Lawyer, with four of our partners recommended.
  • Our team provides practical and commercial advice founded on years of experience and technical know-how to technology and digital media companies that need to be alert to the rules and regulations of competition law.
  • Our Corporate Practice has a reputation for delivering sound legal advice, backed up with extensive industry experience and credentials, to get the best results from technology and digital media transactions.
  • In the fast-changing world of employment law our clients need practical, commercial and cost-effective advice. They get this from our team of employment law professionals.
  • Our team of leading IP advisors deliver cost-effective, strategic and commercial advice to ensure that your IP assets are protected and leveraged to add real value to your business.
  • Our litigation practice advises on all aspects of dispute resolution, with a particular focus on ownership, exploitation and infringement of intellectual property rights and commercial disputes in the technology sector.
  • We have an industry-leading reputation for our outsourcing expertise. Our professionals deliver credible legal advice to providers and acquirers of IT and business process outsourcing (BPO) services.
  • We work alongside companies, many with disruptive technologies, that seek funding, as well as with the venture capital firms, institutional investors and corporate ventures that want to invest in exciting business opportunities.
  • Our regulatory specialists work alongside Kemp Little’s corporate and commercial professionals to help meet their compliance obligations.
  • With a service that is commercial and responsive to our clients’ needs, you will find our tax advice easy to understand, cost-effective and geared towards maximising your tax benefits.
  • At Kemp Little, we advise clients in diverse sectors where technology is fundamental to the ongoing success of their businesses.They include companies that provide technology as a service and businesses where the use of technology is key to their business model, enabling them to bring their product or service to market.
  • We bring our commercial understanding of digital business models, our legal expertise and our reputation for delivering high quality, cost-effective services to this dynamic sector.
  • Acting for market leaders and market changers within the media industry, we combine in-depth knowledge of the structural technology that underpins content delivery and the impact of digitisation on the rights of producers and consumers.
  • We understand the risks facing this sector and work with our clients to conquer those challenges. Testimony to our success is the continued growth in our team of professionals and the clients we serve.
  • We advise at the forefront of the technological intersection between life sciences and healthcare. We advise leading technology and data analytics providers, healthcare institutions as well as manufacturers of medical devices, pharmaceuticals and biotechnological products.
  • For clients operating in the online sector, our teams are structured to meet their commercial, financing, M&A, competition and regulatory, employment and intellectual property legal needs.
  • Our focus on technology makes us especially well positioned to give advice on the legal aspects of digital marketing. We advise on high-profile, multi-channel, cross-border cases and on highly complex campaigns.
  • The mobile and telecoms sector is fast changing and hugely dependent on technology advances. We help mobile and wireless and fixed telecoms clients to tackle the legal challenges that this evolving sector presents.
  • Whether ERP, Linux or Windows; software or infrastructure as a service in the cloud, in a virtualised environment, or as a mobile or service-oriented architecture, we have the experience to resolve legal issues across the spectrum of commercial computer platforms.
  • Our clients trust us to apply our solutions and know-how to help them make the best use of technology in structuring deals, mitigating key risks to their businesses and in achieving their commercial objectives.
  • We have extensive experience of advising customers and suppliers in the retail sector on technology development, licensing and supply projects, and in advising on all aspects of procurement and online operations.
  • Our legal professionals work alongside social media providers and users in relation to the commercial, privacy, data, advertising, intellectual property, employment and corporate issues that arise in this dynamic sector.
  • Our years of working alongside diverse software clients have given us an in-depth understanding of the dynamics of the software marketplace, market practice and alternative negotiating strategies.
  • Working with direct providers of travel services, including aggregators, facilitators and suppliers of transport and technology, our team has developed a unique specialist knowledge of the sector
  • Your life as an entrepreneur is full of daily challenges as you seek to grow your business. One of the key strengths of our firm is that we understand these challenges.
  • Kemp Little is trusted by some of the world’s leading luxury brands and some of the most innovative e-commerce retailers changing the face of the industry.
  • HR Bytes is an exclusive, comprehensive, online service that will provide you with a wide range of practical, insightful and current employment law information. HR Bytes members get priority booking for events, key insight and a range of employment materials for free.
  • FlightDeck is our portal designed especially with start-up and emerging technology businesses in mind to help you get your business up and running in the right way. We provide a free pack of all the things no-one tells you and things they don’t give away to get you started.

Companies to be prosecuted for failing to prevent economic crime

On 2 September 2014, in a speech given to Cambridge Symposium entitled “Shield, Sword and Achilles Heel in the fight against economic crime”, Jeremy Wright, the attorney general, confirmed that the Government is considering the creation of an offence of corporate failure to prevent economic crime.  The offence will be modelled on the offence of failure to prevent bribery in section 7 of the Bribery Act 2010 – a vicarious liability offence, where the company can be found guilty if the bribery was carried out by a subsidiary, employee or agent. 

Framed as a reaction to recent misconduct in the UK banking sector, such as the LIBOR-fixing scandal and the record-breaking fines imposed on Lloyds Bank and others in recent years, Wright said that Government recognises an increasing desire to hold corporates liable for criminal offences to dispel the myth that white-collar crime is victimless:

Ultimately, the losses will fall on members of the public, by reducing the value of investments and pensions funds, or increasing the prices people pay for goods… The Government has made it a priority to ensure we have the correct laws and structures in place [to] tackle fraud and corruption.

Historically, prosecuting companies (other than for corporate manslaughter offences, where a separate legal regime applies) in the UK has been difficult as companies may usually only be found liable for acts of employees and agents if the offender represents someone who is the “directing mind and will” of the company.  However, commentators have already begun to question whether this type of offence will ever be used to bring criminal proceedings against large banks.  Even in the US, where the prosecution of corporate entities is more commonplace, such corporate offences have never been successfully utilised against the larger institutional banks for their role in the sub-prime mortgage scandal and other economic crimes.

As Matt Taibbi explains, in his latest book “The Divide: American Injustice in the Age of the Wealth Gap”, due to a policy of what became known as Collateral Consequences, since 2008 no high-ranking executive from any financial institution has gone to jail or multi-national bank successfully prosecuted. 

Put simply, Collateral Consequences meant that when prosecutors were deciding to bring a criminal charge against a bank, they could “take into account the possibility [of] substantial consequences to a corporation’s officers, directors, employees and shareholders, many of whom may, depending on the size and nature…of the corporation and their role in its operations, have played no role in the criminal conduct, have been completely unaware of it, or have been wholly unable to prevent it.”

According to Matt Taibbi, this policy led to prosecutors becoming wary of bringing any criminal action against banks deemed “too big to fail” which could damage the economy, particularly as the prosecutors were ill-equipped to predict the consequences of such damage. “The attorney general of the United States,” reported Taibbi, “was saying that the economy had grown so complicated that his own office was now and henceforth helpless to decide on its own whether it was okay to prosecute.” 

Will we see a difference in the UK under the latest proposed new legislation?  Having had to ask for a budget increase already this year due to the number of high profile investigations currently being run by the SFO, will it have sufficient resources to pursue institutions which can afford to assemble panels of lawyers commanding the highest rates, all dedicated to defending such claims?

No timescale has been given for when the legislation is likely to be enacted, although it seems unlikely this will happen before the 2015 General Election.

For further information please contact Charles Claisse.