• At Kemp Little, we are known for our ability to serve the very particular needs of a large but diverse technology client base. Our hands-on industry know-how makes us a good fit with many of the world's biggest technology and digital media businesses, yet means we are equally relevant to companies with a technology bias, in sectors such as professional services, financial services, retail, travel and healthcare.
  • Kemp Little specialises in the technology and digital media sectors and provides a range of legal services that are crucial to fast-moving, innovative businesses.Our blend of sector awareness, technical excellence and responsiveness, means we are regularly ranked as a leading firm by directories such as Legal 500, Chambers and PLC Which Lawyer. Our practice areas cover a wide range of legal issues and advice.
  • Our Commercial Technology team has established itself as one of the strongest in the UK. We are ranked in Legal 500, Chambers & Partners and PLC Which Lawyer, with four of our partners recommended.
  • Our team provides practical and commercial advice founded on years of experience and technical know-how to technology and digital media companies that need to be alert to the rules and regulations of competition law.
  • Our Corporate Practice has a reputation for delivering sound legal advice, backed up with extensive industry experience and credentials, to get the best results from technology and digital media transactions.
  • In the fast-changing world of employment law our clients need practical, commercial and cost-effective advice. They get this from our team of employment law professionals.
  • Our team of leading IP advisors deliver cost-effective, strategic and commercial advice to ensure that your IP assets are protected and leveraged to add real value to your business.
  • Our litigation practice advises on all aspects of dispute resolution, with a particular focus on ownership, exploitation and infringement of intellectual property rights and commercial disputes in the technology sector.
  • We have an industry-leading reputation for our outsourcing expertise. Our professionals deliver credible legal advice to providers and acquirers of IT and business process outsourcing (BPO) services.
  • We work alongside companies, many with disruptive technologies, that seek funding, as well as with the venture capital firms, institutional investors and corporate ventures that want to invest in exciting business opportunities.
  • Our regulatory specialists work alongside Kemp Little’s corporate and commercial professionals to help meet their compliance obligations.
  • With a service that is commercial and responsive to our clients’ needs, you will find our tax advice easy to understand, cost-effective and geared towards maximising your tax benefits.
  • At Kemp Little, we advise clients in diverse sectors where technology is fundamental to the ongoing success of their businesses.They include companies that provide technology as a service and businesses where the use of technology is key to their business model, enabling them to bring their product or service to market.
  • We bring our commercial understanding of digital business models, our legal expertise and our reputation for delivering high quality, cost-effective services to this dynamic sector.
  • Acting for market leaders and market changers within the media industry, we combine in-depth knowledge of the structural technology that underpins content delivery and the impact of digitisation on the rights of producers and consumers.
  • We understand the risks facing this sector and work with our clients to conquer those challenges. Testimony to our success is the continued growth in our team of professionals and the clients we serve.
  • We advise at the forefront of the technological intersection between life sciences and healthcare. We advise leading technology and data analytics providers, healthcare institutions as well as manufacturers of medical devices, pharmaceuticals and biotechnological products.
  • For clients operating in the online sector, our teams are structured to meet their commercial, financing, M&A, competition and regulatory, employment and intellectual property legal needs.
  • Our focus on technology makes us especially well positioned to give advice on the legal aspects of digital marketing. We advise on high-profile, multi-channel, cross-border cases and on highly complex campaigns.
  • The mobile and telecoms sector is fast changing and hugely dependent on technology advances. We help mobile and wireless and fixed telecoms clients to tackle the legal challenges that this evolving sector presents.
  • Whether ERP, Linux or Windows; software or infrastructure as a service in the cloud, in a virtualised environment, or as a mobile or service-oriented architecture, we have the experience to resolve legal issues across the spectrum of commercial computer platforms.
  • Our clients trust us to apply our solutions and know-how to help them make the best use of technology in structuring deals, mitigating key risks to their businesses and in achieving their commercial objectives.
  • We have extensive experience of advising customers and suppliers in the retail sector on technology development, licensing and supply projects, and in advising on all aspects of procurement and online operations.
  • Our legal professionals work alongside social media providers and users in relation to the commercial, privacy, data, advertising, intellectual property, employment and corporate issues that arise in this dynamic sector.
  • Our years of working alongside diverse software clients have given us an in-depth understanding of the dynamics of the software marketplace, market practice and alternative negotiating strategies.
  • Working with direct providers of travel services, including aggregators, facilitators and suppliers of transport and technology, our team has developed a unique specialist knowledge of the sector
  • Your life as an entrepreneur is full of daily challenges as you seek to grow your business. One of the key strengths of our firm is that we understand these challenges.
  • Kemp Little is trusted by some of the world’s leading luxury brands and some of the most innovative e-commerce retailers changing the face of the industry.
  • HR Bytes is an exclusive, comprehensive, online service that will provide you with a wide range of practical, insightful and current employment law information. HR Bytes members get priority booking for events, key insight and a range of employment materials for free.
  • FlightDeck is our portal designed especially with start-up and emerging technology businesses in mind to help you get your business up and running in the right way. We provide a free pack of all the things no-one tells you and things they don’t give away to get you started.

Image Rights in Videogames

One of the reasons Activision failed the “transformative” test in the No Doubt case was that the court held that the motion-captured re-creation of Gwen Stefani was too “realistic” to qualify.

Indeed, Judge Sidney Thomas, dissenting in the Keller case, gave this warning: “The logical consequence of the majority view is that all realistic depictions of actual persons, no matter how incidental, are protected by a state law right of publicity regardless of the creative context. This logic jeopardizes [sic] the creative use of historic figures in motion pictures, books, and sound recordings”.   

For now, the safest route for games developers has to be to try and negotiate a licence to use the relevant image.  If that isn’t possible, then advice should be sought to understand the potential risk and exposure.

Position in the UK

In the UK, the concept of an individual having absolute “image rights” does not exist.  This means that individuals do not have a clear right to control all commercial use or exploitation of their image, voice or likeness.  Any remedy they might have for infringement of these rights comes from a jumble of statutory and common law causes of action, none of which is particularly satisfactory.  The most common causes of action would probably be:


To bring a successful libel claim, the individual must establish that the use of his/her image is defamatory. There is no single, definitive judicial interpretation of what constitutes something being defamatory, but the generally accepted test is whether it tends to lower the claimant in the estimation of right-thinking members of society generally, or is likely to affect a person adversely in the estimation of reasonable people generally. It must also cause or be likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of the individual. 

Taking the Noriega lawsuit as an example, it might have been difficult to argue that Manuel Noriega’s reputation had been damaged, given his current residency in a Panamanian jail cell.  However, this is less clear cut where the subject is more divisive: Jonas Savimbi was called a “freedom fighter” in the 1980s and welcomed to the White House by Ronald Reagan; the New York Times subsequently described him as “a warlord, ruling by machete and gun, who is credibly blamed for the massacre of civilians”. On this basis, if a claim was brought in English law, Activision might invoke the defence available where the implication was either substantially true, or was a statement of opinion which the defendant honestly held.

Passing Off

An individual could claim that authorised use of their image constitutes "passing off" – where a commercial entity either tries to pass off their goods or services as another's or falsely implies that another has endorsed their goods or services taking advantage of that person's brand, reputation or goodwill. 

As an example, the ex-Formula 1 racing driver Eddie Irvine brought a successful claim against Talk Radio (now TalkSport) when it doctored a picture of him using a mobile phone by digitally removing the phone and replacing it with a Talk Radio-branded radio, then distributed this image in promotional materials. Eddie Irvine sued Talk Radio on the grounds that it had passed off its radio station as having been endorsed by him. The courts upheld his claim and awarded him damages equivalent to a “reasonable endorsement fee” that he would have been able to charge in order to endorse the station in this way at the time. The court held that it was immaterial that the image was not genuine and was clearly a joke. Rihanna won a similar case against Top Shop, which had been using her image on T-shirts, on the same basis. In this case however, it would be far harder for Savimbi to show that his (in his view, negative) depiction in a computer game in a historical setting would lead viewers to believe that he was endorsing the game in question.

Trademark infringement

A large number of celebrities have registered trademarks for their names, and use of these (or names which are confusingly similar) without permission could constitute trademark infringement (see, for example, the case brought by Lady Gaga against Mind Candy in relation to its release of “The Moshi Dance”, a song sung by cartoon character “Lady Goo Goo” which bore a resemblance to Lady Gaga’s “Bad Romance”) and her trade mark for “LADY GAGA”, which formed the basis of her claim.It’s also possible that in some circumstances the use of an unnamed image of a person in a game could be a trade mark infringement.  Whilst it is not possible to register a general trade mark in respect of an individual's image, some individuals have registered particular photographs or iconic images of themselves as trade marks in the UK and EU. If the images used in the game closely resembled any such image then this could potentially constitute an infringement of the trade mark, especially if the goods and services for the registration included videogames, or if the use in the game was likely to take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the trade mark’s character or reputation. For this reason, sports games for example, need to ensure that they have the necessary rights to use sport stars’ likenesses in their game. Note that trade marks like this need to be actually used in commerce in order to not be vulnerable to revocation; a number of these sorts of “image based” trade marks for celebrities tend to end up abandoned for this reason; for example, the trade mark registration for Alan Shearer’s face, registered in 1998, and later abandoned.

For further information, please contact Andy Moseby or Peter Dalton. 

Contact our experts for further advice

Peter Dalton