• At Kemp Little, we are known for our ability to serve the very particular needs of a large but diverse technology client base. Our hands-on industry know-how makes us a good fit with many of the world's biggest technology and digital media businesses, yet means we are equally relevant to companies with a technology bias, in sectors such as professional services, financial services, retail, travel and healthcare.
  • Kemp Little specialises in the technology and digital media sectors and provides a range of legal services that are crucial to fast-moving, innovative businesses.Our blend of sector awareness, technical excellence and responsiveness, means we are regularly ranked as a leading firm by directories such as Legal 500, Chambers and PLC Which Lawyer. Our practice areas cover a wide range of legal issues and advice.
  • Our Commercial Technology team has established itself as one of the strongest in the UK. We are ranked in Legal 500, Chambers & Partners and PLC Which Lawyer, with four of our partners recommended.
  • Our team provides practical and commercial advice founded on years of experience and technical know-how to technology and digital media companies that need to be alert to the rules and regulations of competition law.
  • Our Corporate Practice has a reputation for delivering sound legal advice, backed up with extensive industry experience and credentials, to get the best results from technology and digital media transactions.
  • In the fast-changing world of employment law our clients need practical, commercial and cost-effective advice. They get this from our team of employment law professionals.
  • Our team of leading IP advisors deliver cost-effective, strategic and commercial advice to ensure that your IP assets are protected and leveraged to add real value to your business.
  • Our litigation practice advises on all aspects of dispute resolution, with a particular focus on ownership, exploitation and infringement of intellectual property rights and commercial disputes in the technology sector.
  • We have an industry-leading reputation for our outsourcing expertise. Our professionals deliver credible legal advice to providers and acquirers of IT and business process outsourcing (BPO) services.
  • We work alongside companies, many with disruptive technologies, that seek funding, as well as with the venture capital firms, institutional investors and corporate ventures that want to invest in exciting business opportunities.
  • Our regulatory specialists work alongside Kemp Little’s corporate and commercial professionals to help meet their compliance obligations.
  • With a service that is commercial and responsive to our clients’ needs, you will find our tax advice easy to understand, cost-effective and geared towards maximising your tax benefits.
  • At Kemp Little, we advise clients in diverse sectors where technology is fundamental to the ongoing success of their businesses.They include companies that provide technology as a service and businesses where the use of technology is key to their business model, enabling them to bring their product or service to market.
  • We bring our commercial understanding of digital business models, our legal expertise and our reputation for delivering high quality, cost-effective services to this dynamic sector.
  • Acting for market leaders and market changers within the media industry, we combine in-depth knowledge of the structural technology that underpins content delivery and the impact of digitisation on the rights of producers and consumers.
  • We understand the risks facing this sector and work with our clients to conquer those challenges. Testimony to our success is the continued growth in our team of professionals and the clients we serve.
  • We advise at the forefront of the technological intersection between life sciences and healthcare. We advise leading technology and data analytics providers, healthcare institutions as well as manufacturers of medical devices, pharmaceuticals and biotechnological products.
  • For clients operating in the online sector, our teams are structured to meet their commercial, financing, M&A, competition and regulatory, employment and intellectual property legal needs.
  • Our focus on technology makes us especially well positioned to give advice on the legal aspects of digital marketing. We advise on high-profile, multi-channel, cross-border cases and on highly complex campaigns.
  • The mobile and telecoms sector is fast changing and hugely dependent on technology advances. We help mobile and wireless and fixed telecoms clients to tackle the legal challenges that this evolving sector presents.
  • Whether ERP, Linux or Windows; software or infrastructure as a service in the cloud, in a virtualised environment, or as a mobile or service-oriented architecture, we have the experience to resolve legal issues across the spectrum of commercial computer platforms.
  • Our clients trust us to apply our solutions and know-how to help them make the best use of technology in structuring deals, mitigating key risks to their businesses and in achieving their commercial objectives.
  • We have extensive experience of advising customers and suppliers in the retail sector on technology development, licensing and supply projects, and in advising on all aspects of procurement and online operations.
  • Our legal professionals work alongside social media providers and users in relation to the commercial, privacy, data, advertising, intellectual property, employment and corporate issues that arise in this dynamic sector.
  • Our years of working alongside diverse software clients have given us an in-depth understanding of the dynamics of the software marketplace, market practice and alternative negotiating strategies.
  • Working with direct providers of travel services, including aggregators, facilitators and suppliers of transport and technology, our team has developed a unique specialist knowledge of the sector
  • Your life as an entrepreneur is full of daily challenges as you seek to grow your business. One of the key strengths of our firm is that we understand these challenges.
  • Kemp Little is trusted by some of the world’s leading luxury brands and some of the most innovative e-commerce retailers changing the face of the industry.
  • HR Bytes is an exclusive, comprehensive, online service that will provide you with a wide range of practical, insightful and current employment law information. HR Bytes members get priority booking for events, key insight and a range of employment materials for free.
  • FlightDeck is our portal designed especially with start-up and emerging technology businesses in mind to help you get your business up and running in the right way. We provide a free pack of all the things no-one tells you and things they don’t give away to get you started.

MIFID II, Financial Markets and Technology


It’s taken a while for the G20 Declarations at the Washington, London and Toronto summits to turn into law; but, as well as grinding ‘exceeding slow’ like the wheels of justice, the wheels of regulation for financial markets and technology look like grinding ‘exceeding fine’. Yet the impression at the moment remains that, unlike the run up to MiFID implementation in November 2007 when industry-wide preparation was extensive, getting ready for MiFID II may catch market participants short.
The EU signalled early on its intention to overhaul MiFID I[1] and MAD[2], and through EMIR[3] to bring OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories within the regulatory net. Now, as we approach the fourth anniversary of the financial crisis, much of the new rule book is in, or approaching, final shape. Even as recently as 10 July however the UK House of Lords EU Sub-Committee in its MiFID II Report[4] was still saying (at paragraph 9, page 9) that although it agreed:
“that a review of MiFID I was necessary, not least because of the technological advances that have taken place since it came into force[, n]evertheless, we are deeply concerned at the speed with which MiFID II has been brought forward”;
and it commented in the Report’s summary that MiFID II as drafted:
“contains fundamental flaws which need to be corrected as a matter of urgency if serious damage to the EU financial services industry is to be avoided.”
So what’s getting their Noble Lordships so exercised?
A new, bigger MiFID – with teeth
First, it’s worth bearing in mind that MiFID II, whilst keeping to the framework of MiFID I, will introduce MiFIR – a regulation, which is directly applicable in all EU Member States – as well as MiFID II – a directive, which needs to be transposed into national law of each EU Member State.  So MiFIR, when it comes into force, will bite directly on those it applies to – the investment firms and credit institutions that MiFID regulates, the financial and non-financial counterparties that EMIR will regulate and (somewhat novelly) ‘persons with proprietary rights to benchmarks’[5].  This is important as MiFID II will have real teeth: among a range of sanctions for breach, Article 75(a) of the current draft of MIFID II proposes fines for companies of up to 10% of revenues of the product line concerned and for individuals of up to 5 million Euros.
Secondly, in the eight months between the first drafts of MiFID II[6] and MiFIR[7] (published on 20 October 2011) and the latest ones (dated 20 June 2012[8]), the documents (excluding the explanatory notes in the earlier drafts) have grown from 225 to over 300 pages, representing the outcome of significant lobbying in the first half of 2012.
MiFID II – deepening and broadening MiFID I
In a nutshell, and so far as relevant to the IT, communications and data community, MiFID II takes the information and venue mechanisms introduced by MiFID I, deepens them for equities and broadens them out for other financial instruments and other forms of trading. 
MiFID II will:
a)  extend MiFID I’s equity pre- and post- trade transparency and transaction reporting rules to cover:
·      depositary receipts and ETFs (exchange traded funds) and similar instruments[9];
·      bonds, structured products and derivatives traded on-market, and emission allowances[10];
·      SIs (systematic internalisers)[11]; and
·      dark pools (except for ‘large scale’ orders and orders held in the venue’s ‘order management facility … pending disclosure’[12]);
b)  extend MiFID I’s regulatory net ‘to capture all types of organised execution and arranging of trading which do not correspond to .. existing venues’[13] by:
·      introducing a new category of OTF (organised trading facility[14]);
·      treating material proprietary trading as systematic internalisation[15];
·      precluding an OTF from also being a SI; and
·      requiring that OTFs match customer orders only (except for matched principal trading)[16];
c)  regulate commodities derivatives markets through liquidity support, market abuse prevention, position management (including limits on positions and commodity contract numbers) and granting ESMA certain intervention powers[17];
d)  introduce in-line risk checks and functional documentation requirements for algorithms[18]; and require ESMA[19] to carry out a formal review of HFT (automated and high frequency trading) and suggest what additional regulation needs to be put in place[20];
e)  introduce competition in CCP (central counterparty) clearing and settlement systems through a new access right based on non-discriminatory, transparent and objective criteria[21]; and
f)   require all client order emails and phone conversation recordings to be kept for 3years-.

Countdown to MiFID II implementation
Despite their Lordships’ recent reservations, there seems little doubt at the moment that the final Level I measures for MiFID II will be agreed if not by end 2012[23] then not much later, with an implementation date currently scheduled for 2015. To put it no more highly, recent difficulties at the top of the industry are unlikely to see a reduction in efforts to regulate trading in interest rate and credit derivative products or benchmarks.  So this broadening and deepening of MiFID, or something very much like it, is almost certain to happen; and what should the IT, communications and data community be doing now?
What should the FS IT, communications and data community be doing now?
MiFID I was passed in April 2004 and the industry made a concerted effort to prepare for implementation three and a half years later in November 2007. That period corresponded with the continued development of trends towards algorithmic and direct trading, lower latency, standardisation, disintermediation, integration and globalisation.  MiFID I acted on, and was in turn influenced by, these technology and market developments, the upshot being a huge increase in the amount of electronic data, outsourcing, systems and communications work, and an arms race to lower latency which reached its greatest intensity in 2010/2011.
The point for MiFID II is that the deepening and broadening of MiFID I will bring about a similar sort of increase to MiFID I, magnified in scale because of the regime’s extension to more instruments and trading venues. Increasing competition and specialisation are likely to see more outsourcing of IT, tasks and processes to large and specialist suppliers (outsourcing itself becoming more granularly regulated as practices develop).
Figure 1 – the Cost Benefit of the Public Cloud (source: Microsoft, November 2010)


And as if that’s not enough, buyers and sellers also have to contend with the Cloud as its economics become increasingly compelling and as it becomes more disruptive:  in research from November 2010[24] Microsoft estimates that at scale (100,000 servers) the Enterprise TCO/server declines by a factor of 10 from private cloud ($3-4,000/server) to public cloud ($3-400/server) [see figure I above].
So, along with MiFID II, technology and market developments in a tougher economic climate, the game of chess for technology customers and suppliers alike gets even more multi-dimensional: strategic choices that need to be made now must be weighed and measured looking out over a five to ten year timeline as the move to the Cloud accelerates.  Getting ready for MiFID II means understanding where the regulation is headed and how it will bite – but this is not enough: as ever, the technology, market and strategic contexts are critical.
[1] The Markets in Financial Instruments Directive 2004/39EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 (OJ 2004 L1/45) http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2004/l_145/l_14520040430en00010044.pdf. See also our White Paper ‘The impact of MiFID and technology used in the financial services sector’ (January 2008) at http://uk.practicallaw.com/4-380-1816?q=MiFID+and+Technology
[2] The Market Abuse Directive (2003/6/EC, OJ 2003 L96/1).
[4] ‘MiFID II: Getting it Right for the City and EU Financial Services Industry’, House of Lords, European Union Sub-Committee, 10 July 2012, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldeucom/28/28.pdf. The text quoted is from the Summary on page 4.
[5] Draft MiFIR, Article 1(1), (2) and (3).
0 These drafts are available at http://www.fixnetix.com
[9] Draft MiFIR, Title II, Chapter 1, Articles 3 to 6.
[10] Draft MiFIR, Title II, Chapter 2, Articles 7 to 10.
[11] Draft MiFIR, Title III, Articles 13 to 20.
[12] Draft MiFIR, Article 4(1).
[13] Draft MiFID II, Recital 7.
[14] Draft MiFIR Article 2(6) defines OTF as a venue “in which multiple third-party buying and selling interests are able to interact in the system” to make a contract.
[15] Draft MiFID II, Recitals 15 and 16.
[16] Draft MiFID II, Article 20.
[17] Including Draft MiFID II, Title IV, Articles 59 and 60; draft MiFIR, Title VII, Articles 31 to 35.
[18] Draft MiFID II, Article 17.
[19] The European Securities and Markets Authority, which succeeded CESR on 1 January 2011.
[20] Draft MiFID II, Article 96(2).
[21] Draft MiFIR, Title VI, Articles 28 and 29. An obligation for compulsory licensing of benchmarks is proposed to be introduced at Article 30.
[22] Draft MiFID II, Articles 16(6), (7).
[23] The scheduled date – see http://www.fsa.gov.uk/