On 29 January 2021, the Kemp Little team joined Deloitte Legal. Click here to view the press release.

As of 30 January 2021, Kemp Little LLP ceased to operate as a firm of solicitors and practice law and ceased to be regulated and authorised by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Kemp Little LLP has been re-named KL Heritage LLP.

If you are looking to contact a specific individual to seek legal advice or in respect of any other business relationship, please contact Deloitte Legal.

If you are seeking to contact the old Kemp Little LLP in relation to a previous business relationship or matter, please get in touch with KL Heritage LLP.

For enquiries relating to Kemp Little technology products and training portal, please email deloittelegal@deloitte.co.uk

 


 

Kemp Little is a trade name used under licence by KL Heritage LLP (formerly Kemp Little LLP, registered number OC300242 and VAT number 182 8854 65).

On 29 January 2021, the Kemp Little team joined Deloitte Legal.  As of 30 January 2021, Kemp Little ceased to operate as a firm of solicitors and practice law. From this date Kemp Little ceased to be authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and is being re-named KL Heritage LLP.

All references to Kemp Little herein are references to KL Heritage LLP, which used to carry on business in that name.

KL Heritage LLP is not connected to or associated with Deloitte Legal or Deloitte LLP in any capacity.

 

Kemp Little
  • Looking for someone?
  • Email us
  • Search
MENU MENU
Insights overview

Employment · 20 April 2020 · Amy Ling

Case update | Employment Tribunal should have stayed proceedings to allow for assessment of a Claimant’s capacity

Section 1 of the Mental Health Act 2005 (MA 2005) states that a person must be assumed to have mental capacity unless the contrary is established. The EAT confirmed in the case of Jhuti v Royal Mail Group  that where a party does not have capacity to make decisions relating to their legal claim, an Employment Tribunal has the power to issue a case management order to appoint a “litigation friend” to act on behalf of that party.

In this case, the Claimant had successfully won claims of constructive unfair dismissal and disability discrimination against her employer, Royal Bank of Scotland Plc (RBS), in the ET. A remedy hearing was listed to consider the amount of award to AB, who was claiming damages of £10million on the basis that RBS’ actions had caused severe depression and psychosis meaning she required 24/7 care.

Although the Claimant was due to give evidence during the first day of the hearing, her counsel told the court that she was not able to give evidence or instructions on that date. Instead, her psychiatric expert gave evidence. The following afternoon, the Claimant attended the hearing and was asked a number of simple questions by her barrister. It quickly became apparent that the Claimant did not recognise her own legal team and gave unintelligible answers, including responding with “sounds and grunts”.

RBS applied for an order staying proceedings in order for an assessment of the Claimant’s capacity to take place. The ET refused the bank’s application on the basis that the presumption of capacity had not been displaced. The Judge relied on the fact that the Claimant’s legal team were satisfied they could act; that the assessment of the Claimant’s Medical expert did not raise concerns about capacity; and, neither of the experts who had given evidence during the hearing had raised concerns about capacity.

RBS then made a further application, to be taken either as an application for a reconsideration of this decision or as a fresh application for a stay, taking into account a note from their psychiatric expert that, if the Claimant’s behaviour during the hearing was taken at “face value”, then there were grounds to doubt her capacity to litigate. This application was also rejected by the ET who felt there had been no material change in circumstances. The Tribunal went on to award AB £4.6million.

RBS appealed to the EAT on the basis that the ET had erred in failing to adjourn the hearing for a formal assessment of AB’s capacity, and in not reconsidering that decision.

On the first ground, the EAT held that the Tribunal had erred in concluding there was no need to assess AB’s capacity. The Judge found that, whilst the case of Jhuti cautioned that Tribunals should “tread carefully” when it came applications concerning capacity to litigate, there are still “logical limits” to the presumption of capacity. In rejecting RBS’ application the ET had relied on a “Catch-22” argument that unless there was already evidence of a lack of capacity, no assessment of capacity would be required. This was incorrect: the ET was not being asked to determine if the Claimant lacked capacity, but whether sufficient concerns had been raised which would justify an assessment to determine that question.  Plainly there was concern for AB’s capacity given the manner in which she had presented at the remedy hearing and so refusing the application was irrational. It was also wrong to attempt to justify the refusal on medical evidence provided by the two psychiatric experts in the case, whose reports were prepared prior to the remedy hearing and who had not had a chance to examine the Claimant following that hearing.

Although the ground of appeal was upheld, the Judge rejected RBS’ argument that the ET’s error rendered the award of damages void. The Judge was satisfied that the ET had reached its decision on damages based on full argument from both sides and therefore there was no need to remit any issue for determination. Had RBS’ application for a stay been successful, this would have only led to an adjournment of proceedings for a period of time in which the assessment would have taken place and (if necessary) a litigation friend appointed for the Claimant.

Comment: The facts of this case are relatively unusual, however it is a useful reminder that the presumption of capacity can be displaced even in the face of medical evidence to the contrary and Tribunals should be live to situations where this may be appropriate.  

LINK: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5e5cee9086650c53a09af60a/Royal_Bank_of_Scotland_PLC_v_AB_UKEAT_0266_18_DA.pdf

  • Share this blog

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin

Amy LingAmy Ling is an employment associate

Get in touch

View the team

Sign up for our newsletters

  • Share this Blog

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin

Other stuff you might like

  1. Webinar | Engaging contractors: your new obligations under the Off Payroll Working Rules
  2. Webinar | People and Pandemic: A U-turn on returning to work and the new Job Support Scheme
  3. UK Government publish further details on the points-based immigration system
The hottest topics in technology
  • Adtech & martech
  • Agile
  • Artificial intelligence
  • EBA outsourcing
  • Brexit
  • Cloud computing
  • Complex & sensitive investigations
  • Connectivity
  • Cryptocurrencies & blockchain
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data analytics & big data
  • Data breaches
  • Data rights
  • Digital commerce
  • Digital content risk
  • Digital health
  • Digital media
  • Digital infrastructure & telecoms
  • Emerging businesses
  • Financial services
  • Fintech
  • Gambling
  • GDPR
  • KLick DPO
  • KLick Trade Mark
  • Open banking
  • Retail
  • SMCR
  • Software & services
  • Sourcing
  • Travel
close
The hottest topics in technology
  • Adtech & martech
  • Agile
  • Artificial intelligence
  • EBA outsourcing
  • Brexit
  • Cloud computing
  • Complex & sensitive investigations
  • Connectivity
  • Cryptocurrencies & blockchain
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data analytics & big data
  • Data breaches
  • Data rights
  • Digital commerce
  • Digital content risk
  • Digital health
  • Digital media
  • Digital infrastructure & telecoms
  • Emerging businesses
  • Financial services
  • Fintech
  • Gambling
  • GDPR
  • KLick DPO
  • KLick Trade Mark
  • Open banking
  • Retail
  • SMCR
  • Software & services
  • Sourcing
  • Travel
Kemp Little

Lawyers
and thought leaders who are passionate about technology

Expand footer

Kemp Little

138 Cheapside
City of London
EC2V 6BJ

020 7600 8080

hello@kemplittle.com

Services

  • Commercial technology
  • Consulting
  • Disputes
  • Intellectual property
  • Employment
  • Immigration

 

  • Sourcing
  • Corporate
  • Data protection & privacy
  • Financial regulation
  • Private equity & venture capital
  • Tax

Sitemap

  • Our people
  • Insights
  • Events
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Cookies
  • Privacy
  • Terms of use
  • Complaints
  • Debt recovery charges

Follow us

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • FlightDeck
  • Sign up for our newsletters

Kemp Little LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (registered number OC300242) and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Its registered office is 138 Cheapside, London EC2V 6BJ. The SRA Standards and Regulations can be accessed by clicking here.

  • Cyber Essentials logo
  • LORCA logo
  • ABTA Partner+ logo
  • Make Your Ask logo
  • FT Innovative Lawyers 2019 winners logo
  • Law Society Excellence Awards shortlisted
  • Legal Business Awards = highly commended
  • Home
  • Our people
  • Services
    • Business restructuring and reorganisation
    • Commercial technology
    • Consulting
    • Corporate
    • Data protection & privacy
    • Digital content & reputation risk
    • Disputes
    • Employment
    • Financial regulation
    • Immigration
    • Innovation
    • Intellectual property
    • Private equity & venture capital
    • Sourcing
    • Tax
    • Travel
  • Resources
  • Insights
  • Covid 19: Your Business Continuity
  • Events
  • About us
    • Who we are
    • Our social responsibilities
    • Our partnerships
    • Join us
  • Contact us
  • FlightDeck
  • Sign up for our newsletters
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
close
close
close

Send us a message

Fill in your details and we'll be in touch soon

[contact-form-7 id="4941" title="General contact form"]
close

Sign up for our newsletter

I would like to receive updates and related news from Kemp Little *

Please select below any publications that you would like to receive:

Newsletters

close

Register for future event information

[contact-form-7 id="4943" title="Subscribe to future events"]
close
close
Generic filters
Exact matches only

Can't remember their name? View everyone

  • Home
  • Our people
  • Services
    • Business restructuring and reorganisation
    • Commercial technology
    • Consulting
    • Corporate
    • Data protection & privacy
    • Digital content & reputation risk
    • Disputes
    • Employment
    • Financial regulation
    • Immigration
    • Innovation
    • Intellectual property
    • Private equity & venture capital
    • Sourcing
    • Tax
    • Travel
  • Resources
  • Insights
  • Covid 19: Your Business Continuity
  • Events
  • About us
    • Who we are
    • Our social responsibilities
    • Our partnerships
    • Join us
  • Contact us
  • FlightDeck
  • Sign up for our newsletters
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn