On 29 January 2021, the Kemp Little team joined Deloitte Legal. Click here to view the press release.

As of 30 January 2021, Kemp Little LLP ceased to operate as a firm of solicitors and practice law and ceased to be regulated and authorised by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Kemp Little LLP has been re-named KL Heritage LLP.

If you are looking to contact a specific individual to seek legal advice or in respect of any other business relationship, please contact Deloitte Legal.

If you are seeking to contact the old Kemp Little LLP in relation to a previous business relationship or matter, please get in touch with KL Heritage LLP.

For enquiries relating to Kemp Little technology products and training portal, please email deloittelegal@deloitte.co.uk

 


 

Kemp Little is a trade name used under licence by KL Heritage LLP (formerly Kemp Little LLP, registered number OC300242 and VAT number 182 8854 65).

On 29 January 2021, the Kemp Little team joined Deloitte Legal.  As of 30 January 2021, Kemp Little ceased to operate as a firm of solicitors and practice law. From this date Kemp Little ceased to be authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and is being re-named KL Heritage LLP.

All references to Kemp Little herein are references to KL Heritage LLP, which used to carry on business in that name.

KL Heritage LLP is not connected to or associated with Deloitte Legal or Deloitte LLP in any capacity.

 

Kemp Little
  • Looking for someone?
  • Email us
  • Search
MENU MENU
Insights overview

Employment · 30 January 2018 · Marian Bloodworth

Can an employee raising concerns at work purely out of self-interest be protected by whistleblowing legislation?

The EAT has confirmed in the case of Parsons v Airplus International Limited that an employee who complained about compliance issues solely out of concern… Read more

more content below

The EAT has confirmed in the case of Parsons v Airplus International Limited that an employee who complained about compliance issues solely out of concern for her own interest did not make a qualifying disclosure, and so was not protected for the purposes of the relevant whistleblowing legislation.  This contrasts with a Court of Appeal decision last year that a disclosure made for reasons of self-interest could potentially also be in the public interest.

Ms Parsons started work as a Legal & Compliance Officer for Airplus on 17 August 2015, despite not possessing any compliance qualifications or experience.  From the start, she appeared nervous about her duties and presented concerns about the fact that she could be personally liable if Airplus did not comply with its regulatory obligations.  Among other points, she expressed her worries that her employer did not possess a consumer credit licence, nor had it appointed a Money Laundering Reporting Officer, although it was not necessarily clear that either of these points was required from a compliance perspective.

Complaints were made about Ms Parsons during the period 9-21 September 2015 relating not to the fact that she had raised these concerns, but to the way in which she had raised them.  She was described as rude and disrespectful. After only six weeks, her employment was terminated, after she had alienated a number of individuals with whom she came into contact in the organisation.

Ms Parsons subsequently claimed she had been automatically unfairly dismissed for making whistleblowing disclosures.  The employment tribunal acknowledged, and the EAT later agreed, that while a whistleblower could potentially make “hybrid” disclosures out of a mixture of self-interest and genuine public interest, Ms Parsons was motivated solely by her self-interest, and had not reasonably believed her concerns to be in the public interest.  The EAT also approved the tribunal’s findings that Ms Parsons was dismissed for actions before and after the alleged disclosures, rather than the disclosures themselves. Described by a witness as leaving “burnt soil” behind her, the EAT agreed that Ms Parsons’ irrational behaviour, fixation on her personal liability and a failure to work with her colleagues were the actual reasons for dismissal.

Comment: Any employer facing a similarly challenging set of circumstances, especially in relation to an employee working in a compliance function, should tread carefully in order to demonstrate that the actual reason for any subsequent dismissal is unrelated to the fact that the employee may have raised concerns which they subsequently seek to present as whistleblowing disclosures.

  • Share this blog

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin

Marian BloodworthMarian Bloodworth is an employment partner

Get in touch

View the team

Sign up for our newsletters

  • Share this Blog

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin

Other stuff you might like

  1. Webinar | Engaging contractors: your new obligations under the Off Payroll Working Rules
  2. Webinar | People and Pandemic: A U-turn on returning to work and the new Job Support Scheme
  3. UK Government publish further details on the points-based immigration system
The hottest topics in technology
  • Adtech & martech
  • Agile
  • Artificial intelligence
  • EBA outsourcing
  • Brexit
  • Cloud computing
  • Complex & sensitive investigations
  • Connectivity
  • Cryptocurrencies & blockchain
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data analytics & big data
  • Data breaches
  • Data rights
  • Digital commerce
  • Digital content risk
  • Digital health
  • Digital media
  • Digital infrastructure & telecoms
  • Emerging businesses
  • Financial services
  • Fintech
  • Gambling
  • GDPR
  • KLick DPO
  • KLick Trade Mark
  • Open banking
  • Retail
  • SMCR
  • Software & services
  • Sourcing
  • Travel
close
The hottest topics in technology
  • Adtech & martech
  • Agile
  • Artificial intelligence
  • EBA outsourcing
  • Brexit
  • Cloud computing
  • Complex & sensitive investigations
  • Connectivity
  • Cryptocurrencies & blockchain
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data analytics & big data
  • Data breaches
  • Data rights
  • Digital commerce
  • Digital content risk
  • Digital health
  • Digital media
  • Digital infrastructure & telecoms
  • Emerging businesses
  • Financial services
  • Fintech
  • Gambling
  • GDPR
  • KLick DPO
  • KLick Trade Mark
  • Open banking
  • Retail
  • SMCR
  • Software & services
  • Sourcing
  • Travel
Kemp Little

Lawyers
and thought leaders who are passionate about technology

Expand footer

Kemp Little

138 Cheapside
City of London
EC2V 6BJ

020 7600 8080

hello@kemplittle.com

Services

  • Commercial technology
  • Consulting
  • Disputes
  • Intellectual property
  • Employment
  • Immigration

 

  • Sourcing
  • Corporate
  • Data protection & privacy
  • Financial regulation
  • Private equity & venture capital
  • Tax

Sitemap

  • Our people
  • Insights
  • Events
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Cookies
  • Privacy
  • Terms of use
  • Complaints
  • Debt recovery charges

Follow us

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • FlightDeck
  • Sign up for our newsletters

Kemp Little LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (registered number OC300242) and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Its registered office is 138 Cheapside, London EC2V 6BJ. The SRA Standards and Regulations can be accessed by clicking here.

  • Cyber Essentials logo
  • LORCA logo
  • ABTA Partner+ logo
  • Make Your Ask logo
  • FT Innovative Lawyers 2019 winners logo
  • Law Society Excellence Awards shortlisted
  • Legal Business Awards = highly commended
  • Home
  • Our people
  • Services
    • Business restructuring and reorganisation
    • Commercial technology
    • Consulting
    • Corporate
    • Data protection & privacy
    • Digital content & reputation risk
    • Disputes
    • Employment
    • Financial regulation
    • Immigration
    • Innovation
    • Intellectual property
    • Private equity & venture capital
    • Sourcing
    • Tax
    • Travel
  • Resources
  • Insights
  • Covid 19: Your Business Continuity
  • Events
  • About us
    • Who we are
    • Our social responsibilities
    • Our partnerships
    • Join us
  • Contact us
  • FlightDeck
  • Sign up for our newsletters
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
close
close
close

Send us a message

Fill in your details and we'll be in touch soon

[contact-form-7 id="4941" title="General contact form"]
close

Sign up for our newsletter

I would like to receive updates and related news from Kemp Little *

Please select below any publications that you would like to receive:

Newsletters

close

Register for future event information

[contact-form-7 id="4943" title="Subscribe to future events"]
close
close
Generic filters
Exact matches only

Can't remember their name? View everyone

  • Home
  • Our people
  • Services
    • Business restructuring and reorganisation
    • Commercial technology
    • Consulting
    • Corporate
    • Data protection & privacy
    • Digital content & reputation risk
    • Disputes
    • Employment
    • Financial regulation
    • Immigration
    • Innovation
    • Intellectual property
    • Private equity & venture capital
    • Sourcing
    • Tax
    • Travel
  • Resources
  • Insights
  • Covid 19: Your Business Continuity
  • Events
  • About us
    • Who we are
    • Our social responsibilities
    • Our partnerships
    • Join us
  • Contact us
  • FlightDeck
  • Sign up for our newsletters
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn